


Thoughts, experiences, and opinions about education as I share my personal leadership journey while earning a Master of Arts in Educational Leadership and Administration.



eted.
>
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/af/dd/dd/afdddd164b88a69d031738073ffd24b6.jpg
My school board voted unanimously to “help middle and high schools that want to start classes later.” Based on the recommendations made by the American Academy of Pediatrics, their study found that starting school 8:30 am or later would improve the health of teenage students by aligning school schedules to their biological sleep rhythms.
Many parents are in favor of the later start time to give their children more time to participate in extracurricular activities and keep up with homework. They believe the later start time can provide more energy and alertness for the student.
Some of the challenges to a later start time is the logistics of transportation for students and if the district has enough resources to allocate for the differing start and later end times. Also, for working parents or parents that have other children in elementary or middle school might have challenges with pick up and drop off.
As a teacher at a high school, I prefer the early start time of 7:30 AM. Teenagers love to stay up late and I think giving them extra time to sleep in and start the day later is not going to make that huge of a difference in academic performance. We are only looking at about 1-hour difference in time.
I think it is a reality of life to have to get up in the morning and make it to work on time. I do not agree with adjusting the start time for middle and high school students. I think it is good preparation for the real world. No job is going to adjust their hours to accommodate their employees, why should we do this when they are so close to becoming adults?
What are your thoughts on having later start times for middle and high school students to accommodate their biological sleep rhythms?
Meaning/Observed Perspective of Participants
I was able to meet with the trainers for about one hour prior to the staff development training. We discussed the process of how and why the training was developed. The District Resource teachers work directly with the school sites administrators and special education departments. They received overwhelming feedback of the frustrations teachers had when working on IEPs with the new software program. There were many glitches and issues with calculating the LRE. The District SPED office did a random check of IEP’s and LRE calculations, pulling 2 from every school site and found that calculations were inconsistent across the district. Some schools used hours, some used minutes, some used days. There was no set guideline, policy, or procedure recommended by the district. With this information, the district office developed guidelines that are aligned with both Federal and State laws for teachers to follow as they use the new software system.