![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCI4XH45xliLSVKlj3FBsSbujnRk8opNghXTYPoPfJHOaYksaOZlB4a91iiER-dowv6u_o6aEideIZ8_sVWJz6R7XgJlBk8iXyTgu44HtauVMO4zWgQJW9enVfOPRvaNNNyH_9hVye3So/s320/Wordle+-+Data+%2526+Assessment.png)
I think only using standardized high stakes testing to determine merit pay, ineffectiveness of schools/teachers, or student performance is an unfair practice. In addition, making assumption based on results from one standardized test does not accurately reflect a student’s true academic capabilities. I believe standardized high stakes testing provides only a small snapshot of how that student is performing for that particular day or hour it was given. It is important to understand the many factors that can skew the outcome. For example, the student might not be a great test taker or the conditions for testing (large room, excess noise, etc) could negatively influence performance. There also seems to be a huge discrepancy amongst schools that chose to spend a significant amount of hours on test prep versus focusing on content area instruction. I think this practice can greatly affect equity and access for students and plays a huge role in increasing the learning gap between higher and lower performing subgroups (Cimarusti, 2015). According to the Washington Post (2014), standardized testing “highly underestimates the achievement and college readiness” for English language learners, special education, minority and low-income children.
To ensure equity and access for all students, I think it is important to incorporate standardized testing as one of the many pieces of data to accurately assess or evalu
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2KVi-Zr-mv35pZnpoj4q90Rt0h63BV6wnOD0XkS4mnVG5q5CM2gHhFxJ6kMgGujvzgxuLBnLF6JqqJiaWkgE62meION0CsZQzsBdqvL5g0jPlXcmKt257n1OTr5yQChOuLxMCU0snDGg/s320/Wordle+-+Data+%2526+Assessment.png)
ate school/ teacher effectiveness or student performance. Incorporating multiple measures of data such as graduation rates, discipline outcomes, demographic information, and teacher-created assessments can provide a more accurate determination of effectiveness. Another important aspect to look at is the non-academic measures of motivation and perseverance (Strauss, 2014). These social emotional qualities can also be an important indicator for teacher effectiveness and student success. Using these types of additional data, to include high stakes standardized testing, can ensure equity and access for all students.
Cimarusti, D. (2015). The network for public education. Resistance to High Stakes Tests Serves the Cause of Equity in Education: A Reply to “We Oppose Anti-Testing Efforts” Retrieved on June 4, 2017 from: https://networkforpubliceducation.org/2015/05/resistance-to-high-stakes-tests-serves-the-cause-of-equity-in-education/
Strauss, V. (2014) Washington Post. The myth of Common Core equity. Retrieved on June 5, 2017 from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2014/03/10/the-myth-of-common-core-equity/?utm_term=.fab4c60cf86b